Let me first explain what the provided code does, including...
Let me first explain what the provided code does, including how the k = k % nums.size()
line affects the result.
Code Explanation
The code is designed to rotate an array nums
to the right by k
steps. Rotating an array to the right by k
steps means that the last k
elements will move to the front of the array, and the rest will shift to the right. For example, rotating [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
by k = 2
results in [4, 5, 1, 2, 3]
.
Key Steps in the Code
-
Reverse the Entire Array:
int i = 0; int j = nums.size() - 1; while (i < j) { swap(nums[i], nums[j]); i++; j--; }
This reverses the entire array. For example:
- Input:
nums = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
- After reversing:
nums = [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
- Input:
-
Reverse the First
k
Elements:int s = 0; int e = k - 1; while (s <= e) { swap(nums[s], nums[e]); s++; e--; }
This reverses the first
k
elements of the array (wherek
is the number of steps to rotate). For example:- Before:
nums = [5, 4, 3, 2, 1]
- After reversing the first
k
elements (say,k = 2
):nums = [4, 5, 3, 2, 1]
- Before:
-
Reverse the Remaining Last
(size - k)
Elements:int p = k; int t = nums.size() - 1; while (p <= t) { swap(nums[p], nums[t]); p++; t--; }
This reverses the remaining portion of the array (i.e., from index
k
to the end). For example:- Before:
nums = [4, 5, 3, 2, 1]
- After reversing the last
(size - k)
elements:nums = [4, 5, 1, 2, 3]
- Before:
The Issue with k = k % nums.size()
and Example
Why is k = k % nums.size()
important?
If k
is greater than the size of the array (nums.size()
), performing the rotation would produce the same result as k % nums.size()
steps. For example, rotating an array of size 7 by 10 steps is equivalent to rotating it by 10 % 7 = 3
steps.
However, your statement about k = 0
is incorrect. Here's why:
-
If
k = k % nums.size()
andk = 3
initially withsize = 7
:k = 3 % 7; // k is still 3
-
Only if
k = nums.size()
(e.g.,k = 7
), then:k = 7 % 7; // k becomes 0
When k = 0
, no rotation is needed, and the array remains unchanged. This is the correct expected behavior because performing 7 (or any multiple of 7) rotations on an array of size 7 results in the same array.
Example:
-
Input:
nums = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
,k = 3
- After
k = k % nums.size()
:k = 3 % 7 = 3
- Final output:
[5, 6, 7, 1, 2, 3, 4]
- After
-
Input:
nums = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
,k = 10
- After
k = k % nums.size()
:k = 10 % 7 = 3
- Final output:
[5, 6, 7, 1, 2, 3, 4]
- After
-
Input:
nums = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
,k = 7
- After
k = k % nums.size()
:k = 7 % 7 = 0
- No rotation happens. Final output:
[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
- After
Why Your Concern About k = 0
Being "Wrong" Is Incorrect
When k = 0
after k = k % nums.size()
, the code correctly does not perform the rotation since the array remains unchanged. This behavior is correct, and it is not a wrong result.
Summary
- The code rotates the array to the right by
k
steps using a three-reverse approach. - Adding
k = k % nums.size()
prevents unnecessary rotations whenk
is greater than the array size or exactly equal to it. - If
k = 0
after the modulo operation, the array remains unchanged, which is the correct behavior.